EU to remove protection for wildlife
20/11/2008 09:49:04 November 2008. A weapon in the fight against wildlife crime could be lost because of changes to European agricultural policy. The EU wants to severe the link between the money paid to landowners under the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and laws to protect wildlife from poisoning and trapping, one of the few good parts of the CAP.At present landowners must comply with Article 8 of the Birds Directive, which bans the ‘non-selective capture or killing of birds,' if they want to receive the cash.
Glenogil Estate had £100,000 witheld
The owner of the Glenogil estate (Very close to where a dead White-tailed sea eagle was found in May 2008) in Angus, Scotland, a multimillionaire investment banker called John Dodd, recently had a record £107,650 in CAP payments withheld by the Scottish executive after police found poisoned baits and illegal pesticides on the estate in 2006.
However, EU member states are trying to streamline the CAP, pruning out parts of the policy thought to be unnecessary or irrelevant in a so-called ‘health check'. Cross compliance - the name given to the links between CAP payments and other laws - is under close scrutiny and the European Commission has recommended the link with Article 8 should be one of those dropped.
Link should be maintained
The Council of Ministers, which makes the EU's laws, could reach a decision as early as next week. The RSPB wants the UK Government to fight for the link to be retained.
Ian West, Head of Investigations at the RSPB, said: "The loss of this option from cross compliance would be a blow for wildlife protection in the UK. Deliberate poisoning is a major threat to birds of prey; we had 49 reports of raptors being poisoned last year. A mixture of pesticides killed a white-tailed eagle found on a Scottish estate this May. Most such crimes happen on land managed for game bird shooting, but the people convicted are often employees of the landowners rather than the landowners themselves.
"Every parent knows how effective threatening to take a child's pocket money away can be. This is no different. Why should landowners who fail to uphold the rules continue to receive public support? We should hit them where it hurts - in the pocket."
He added: "We have only just begun to explore the potential of using cross compliance to reduce wildlife crime. To lose this weapon from our armoury now would be a tragedy. EU ministers need to think again."
